..., citing ongoing purchases of Russian oil by New Delhi. Previously, the U.S. introduced a baseline tariff of 25%, which could be raised further within a day (by August 6). Trump expressed extreme dissatisfaction that India continues to import energy resources from Russia and even benefits by reselling them. Furthermore, Washington has not ruled out the possibility of introducing prohibitive tariffs of 100% and even 500% on Indian exports to the U.S. if Russia does not resolve the conflict in Ukraine by the deadline set by the U.S. (August 8). These threats represent secondary sanctions aimed at limiting global demand for Russian hydrocarbons. Such tough rhetoric is causing concern among investors and international trading partners. The Indian ...

... accelerating its gas reserves ahead of winter, while the global energy sector is witnessing a revival in demand for traditional energy resources, such as coal, amid high prices and the need for reliable energy supply. Below are the details of these and other key ... ... "three-digit" tariffs (100% or more) against countries purchasing Russian oil if Moscow does not halt hostilities in Ukraine by August 8 — the date Washington has designated as a deadline. While specific figures for the new sanctions were not ...

... both sides: the EU gains additional supply guarantees for gas and oil, while the U.S. secures expanded markets and capital influx from increased exports. This positive trading signal has reinforced market confidence in the stability of future energy resource demand. On the other hand, the U.S. administration continues to ramp up pressure on Moscow. In late July, President Trump significantly shortened the timeframe set for achieving a ceasefire in Ukraine (an ultimatum of about 10 days) and indicated that he is "not concerned" about market reactions to potential new stringent measures against Russia. This refers to the potential introduction of maximum tariffs on Russian goods and secondary ...

... receives additional guarantees of stable gas and oil supplies, while the U.S. gains market expansion and capital inflow through increased exports. This positive trade signal has bolstered market confidence in the sustainability of future demand for energy resources. Concurrently, the U.S. administration continues to ramp up pressure on Moscow. President Trump shortened the deadline for achieving a ceasefire in Ukraine (an ultimatum of approximately 10 days, expiring August 8) and made it clear that he is "not concerned" about any potential negative market reactions to the implementation of new stringent measures against Russia. This involves the potential ...

... both sides: the EU gains additional guarantees of stable gas and oil supplies, while the U.S. expands its markets and attracts capital through increased exports. This positive signal has strengthened market confidence in the resilience of future energy resource demand. At the same time, the U.S. administration is ramping up pressure on Moscow. At the end of July, President Trump shortened the timeline for achieving a truce in Ukraine (the ultimatum expires on August 8) and indicated willingness to take extreme measures, regardless of potential market reactions. This involves the possibility of imposing maximum tariffs on Russian goods and secondary sanctions against buyers ...